|
Students Protest ;
Administration Stonewalls
by Rachel Lagodka
Friday December 1st
What began as a small gathering
of core supporters taking shelter by the SUB from the rain swelled to a crowd of
150 strong sign-carrying slogan-shouting protestors. They marched to the edge of
campus to hear their exiled elected student leaders and then right up the stairs
of the administration building where 45 of them sat in the hallway outside the
president’s office demanding answers.
“The repression on campus is
the worst I’ve seen in 26 years” said professor AJ Meyers Williams who came by
to see the protest with other faculty. “Leadership is very important and must be
in tune with the students’ needs, and debate needs to be a part of the college
atmosphere. If you can’t have that on campus then something is wrong and it
filters down from the administration to the chairs to the faculty and then to
the students. College is a place to grow the leaders of tomorrow. They need role
models. If the administration has no honesty or integrity, students will pick up
on that.”
He and his colleagues, while
pleased that 150 students cared enough to come out in the rain, were concerned
that most of the students on campus care more about going out drinking than
about the issues that affect their world.
“What are we? Seriously
annoyed! What do we want? Free speech!” the students shouted, taking turns at
the megaphone. “Seriously annoyed” was the initial judicial finding as a result
of charges filed by residence life director Corina Caracci.
This language was changed to “threatened the health and safety” in the letter
sent by Linda Eaton dean of students to the students informing them of the
judicial finding. This question was one of many the students had for the
administration as the rain threatened but abated until after dark.
“Where are you Judge Kahn?”
read one sign referring to the federal judge who still has not answered whether
he will grant a preliminary injunction to allow the students back on campus.
Meanwhile they have missed one semester of school. 
New Paltz mayor Jason West
arrived and the crowd instantly stopped singing and shouting and clanging tin
cans and drums to listen. He began his speech by telling the students that the
administration had tried to discourage him from coming to campus and had told him
that the village government should have no role in campus affairs. “However” he
said “I say that the students are the backbone of the economy and you are my
constituents just as much as someone who has lived here all their life. Just
because your landlord is the biggest landlord in the village doesn’t mean that
you don’t live here.” He told them that they deserved fair hearings on campus
with the right to a lawyer and to cross examine witnesses, rights which are
routinely denied to students because of the unconstitutional judicial process on
campus. Mayor West said that he also disagreed with town court Judge Judy Reichler’s
decision to convict student body president Justin Holmes of
harassment, and he lamented the spending of resources on the persecution of
students. He complimented the crowd on their sophistication and perseverance.
“You have done everything right,” he said “As a politician and an activist I can
tell you that too often when you lose, you give up, and I want to commend you
and thank you for keeping up the fight.”
Igor Gembitsky was there to
support freedom of speech on behalf of the newly formed campus libertarian party
“Civil liberties are very important,” he said “and students often get the raw
end of the stick. It’s because they’re a small constituency. Not voting should
carry a social stigma.”
“Whose J? RJ and Who’s in?
Justin.” They shouted making puns on the elected students’
names, and marched to the edge of campus where the exiled elected officials
could legally stand and address them.
Justin started with something
about Mario Savio but my dog scared the crap out of me by darting near rte 32,
or no, “Hawk Drive” so I didn’t get it. He then spoke about how the students and
faculty should have the right to shape the university, but this administration
seeks to exert top down control on virtually every element of campus life. “We
have a decision to make as a generation,” he said “the tools of technology are a
part of the way we exert our free speech and we cannot allow them to be used to
stifle free speech.” He brought up the flawed policies on campus that mask the
truth about sexual misconduct and the drug policy, harshest and out of step with
the system, that expels student for a first or second drug offence.
RJ said that it was a “...huge
point that students care. Everyone thinks that nobody else cares, but we need to
reach out to each other and show that we care. The administration needs to see
that students care or they won’t change anything.”
The students shouted “storm the
HAB” and marched toward the building taking the stairs and the elevator. The
first message they got was vaguely threatening : the administrators
“don’t want anything to happen or negative things might happen.” The air was
stifling. Around 45 people were crammed together chanting and shouting as a
police
officer stood twitching and sternly grasping a set of handcuffs. The chief of
police was there, not in uniform, pacing in the small confines with a megaphone
which he had confiscated from one of the students though it was of little use in
the packed hallway.
The administrators agreed to
answer questions about administrative malfeasance, and the students had many, but all the answers were about why
they wouldn’t answer the students’ questions.
They kept repeating that the issue would be solved by the lawsuit and they
wouldn’t comment on anything related to the lawsuit. In spite of all the anom alies
they consider the judicial process fair. David Eaton told the students that the
administrators just “facilitate the process” they are not
playing a role in the action; “the charges were filed by police and individuals.”
Once the appeal is denied, a student must seek redress in court outside of
campus.
“Who is responsible, then?”
asked one student “Who are you more beholden to, your lawyers or your students?”
asked another “What’s not being spoken is that we think that the administration
wanted to get rid of Justin and RJ and this was a convenient way for you to do
it,” said another. David Eaton explained that there was no personal vendetta
because he has a “great personal relationship” with Justin and RJ.
Ten students stayed in the
hallway for several hours until police threatened to arrest them.
“Students should not be kicked
out of school for using their freedom of speech, including use of cameras and
emails. This sets a precedent, and could affect student organizations, student
leaders, literary organizations, greek life, etc. The students are what make up
the college, and we should not have to be afraid to speak up!” said student
organizer Olga Vasquez explaining the purpose of the demonstration.
see also:
Seriously Annoying
by
Erin Quinn
Judge Convicts Holmes; Acquits
Curtis and Partington by Rachel Lagodka
|